Internet based teacher guided self study versus conventional didactic lecture

Jose P Augustine

Abstract


There has been a shift from the teacher oriented teaching learning (TL) methods to learner oriented teaching learning methods. The traditional didactic lecture is frowned upon by many. The internet is looked up to, as a source of unlimited information by both the teaching as well as student fraternity. In this comparative study the knowledge retention immediately after instruction by internet based teacher guided self-study and conventional didactic lecture is assessed.

Objectives: To evaluate and assess the knowledge gained by the two teaching methodology.

Materials and Methods: Interventional study done with sixty students, an informed consent was taken and divided into two groups of 30 each. Pre test was done. Conventional didactic lecture was used as the method of TL in one group and Internet based teacher guided self-study (IBGSS) was used as the TL method for other. Post test was done after the session.

Results: 1. The post test scores after traditional didactic lecture and internet based teacher guided self-study methods where significantly more than pre test, paired t test showed p = 0 and p = 0 respectively; 2. The post test scores of traditional lecture were significantly higher than IBGSS, unpaired t test showed p < 0.003.

The study shows that traditional lecture is better than internet based guided self-study for knowledge assimilation and retention.

 

Keywords: Didactic lecture, Self-study, Medical education.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Karaksha A, Grant G, Anoopkumar, Dukie S, Nirthanam S, Davery A. Student Engagement in Pharmacology course using online learning tools. Am J Pharm Edu 2013;77(6):125-30.

Martha A. K, Jeffrey K, Cheryl H. Traditional Versus a Modified Problem-based Learning Activity: Is There a Difference in Student Knowledge Retention. Top Integr Health Care 2014;l 5:2-6.

Michel M, Bischoff A, zu Heringdorf D, Neumann D, Jakobs K. Problem- vs. lecture-based pharmacology teaching in a German medical school. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch Pharmacol 2002;366(1):64-8.

Ellaway R, Masters K. e-Learning in medical education Part 1: Learning, teaching and assessment. Med Teacher 2008;30(5):455-73.

Tenenbaum G, Naidu S, Jegede O, Austin J. Constructivist pedagogy in conventional on-campus and distance learning practice: an exploratory investigation. Learn Instruction 2001;11(2):87-111.

Wu J, Tennyson R, Hsia T. A study of student satisfaction in a blended e-learning system environment. Computers Educ 2010;55(1):155-64.

Nieder G, Borges N, Pearson J. Medical Student Use of Online Lectures: Exam Performance, Learning Styles, Achievement Motivation and Gender. Medical Science Educator. 2011;21(3):222-8.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.