Evaluating patient’s attitude towards being assessed and treated by undergraduate Physiotherapy students in a Medical College

Rashmi Mahulkar, Garima Rathi, Sneha Uikey, Mangla Deshpande, Maneesha Deshpande

Abstract


Purpose: Clinical Placements are integral components of the education of students who are training to become health care professionals. Patient’s satisfaction is vital component in the evaluation of health care outcomes, particularly in the area of rehabilitation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate inpatient attitude towards being assessed and treated by undergraduate physiotherapy students at VSPM College of physiotherapy and Lata Mangeshkar hospital.

Method: 50 inpatient of age ranging between 15-64 years were asked to fill up the questionnaire.

Results:1) Consent and Supervision: Result for this domain is positive with only two questions having negative response. In question number 1 -we got 100% negative response with all 50 patients saying NO and for question number 4-84% saying NO and 16% saying YES. 2) Standard of Care: Result for this domain is positive where every question had positive feedback. 3) Personal Feelings: Result for this domain is positive with only one question having negative response. The question for which we got negative response is question number 16 for which 62% saying YES and 38% saying NO. 4) General Comments: Result for this domain is positive where every question had positive feedback.

Conclusion: In our study we found that although the hospital lacks in taking written consent before students assessing and treating patients but patients have high level of confidence, trust, and satisfaction among the students treating them. They feel comfortable while communicating with medical students. In spite of being a rural area there are no cultural or gender issues.

 

Keywords: Patient’s attitude-Standard of care-Patient’s satisfaction

Full Text:

PDF

References


Burgin RA, Fors. UGH: Interactive simulated patient-an advanced tool for student-activated learning in medicine and healthcare. Comput Educ.203;40:361-76.

Hobbs C, Henley E, Higgsj, Williams V: Clinical education program strategies for challenging times. Focus Health Prof Educ. 2000;2:1-17.

Lekkas P, Larsen T, Kumar S. Grimmer K, Nyland L, and Chipchase L, Juil G et al.: no model of clinical education for physiotherapy student is superior to another: a systemic review. Aust P hysiother.2007;53(1):19-28.

Morison S, Boohan M, and Jenkins J, Mountray M: facilitating undergraduate inter professional learning in healthcare: comparing classroom and clinical learning for nursing and medical students. Learn Health Soc Care. 2003;2:92-104.

Issenberg SB. The scope of simulation base health care education. Simul Healthcare 2006; 1(4):203-8. [PIMD 19088590].

Batchelor D, Owens DJ, Read M, Bloor M. Patient satisfaction studies: methodology, management and consumer evaluation. Int J Health Care Qual Assur.1994;797):22-30.[PMID 10140849].

Franchignoni F, Ottonello M, Benevolo E, Tesio L Satisfaction with hospital rehabilitation; is it related to life satisfaction, functional status, age or education? J Rehabil Med. 2002;34(3);105 Batchelor D, Owens-8[PMID 12395936].

Heinemann A, Bode R, Cichowski K, Kan E. Measuring patient satisfaction with medical rehabilitation. J Rehabil Outcome Means.1997;1:52-65.

Lliffe S, Wilcock J, Manthorpe J, Moriarty J, Cornes M Clough R et al. Can clinicians benefit from patient satisfaction surveys? Evaluating the NSF for older people, 2005-2006.J R Soc Med. 2008;101[12];598-604.(PMID 19092030).

Keith RA. Patient satisfaction and rehabilitation services. Arch Phys Med Rehabil.1998;79(9):1122-8[PMID 9749695].

Mangset M, Dahl TE, Forde R, Wyller TB. We’re just sick people, nothingelse’. factors contributing to elderly stroke patients satisfaction with rehabilitation. Clin Rehabil.2008;22(9):825-35[PMID 18728136].

Ottenbacher KJ, Gonzales VA, Smith PM, Llig SB, Fiedler RC, Granger CV. Satisfaction with medical rehabilitation in patients with cerebrovascular impairment. Am J Phys Med Rehabil.2001;80(12):876-84.[PMID 11821665].

Pound P, Gompertz P, Ebrahim S. Patient satisfaction with stroke services. Clin Rehabil 1994;8:7-17.

Tyson SF, Turner G. The process of stroke rehabilitation: what happens and why. Clinical Rehabil 1999;13(4):322-32[PMID 10460120].

Katthy Stiller, Marissa Sorich, Kate Roberts: Evaluating patient’s attitude towards being assessed and treated by undergraduate physiotherapy students. The internet journal of allied health science and practice Vol.11 No.1.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.