Students’ Perception about Teaching Learning Media in Didactic Lectures

Tanuja Manohar, Amruta Dashputra, Chari Suresh

Abstract


Teaching learning media plays an extremely important role in the learning process of students. With advances in technology, traditional teaching aids like chalk board or Over Head Projector are gradually getting replaced by power point presentations. This study was aimed to assess students' perception of teaching learning medium. This cross-sectional study was carried out at NKPSIMS & RC, Nagpur, India. A questionnaire was given to 354 medical students. Their preference about three commonly used TL media i.e. chalkboard, overhead projector, and power point presentation in didactic lectures were studied. Students preferred PPP as compared to CB and OHP as effective TL media in didactic lectures. Combination of CB + PPP was preferred more as compared to single medium. PPP was rated as a best medium for understanding newer concepts, understanding diagrams, flow charts and algorithms, registration of definitions and new terminologies, understanding clinical knowledge, followed by CB, but very few students preferred OHP as preferred medium. For ease of notes taking however more weight age was given to CB as compared to PPP. Majority of students felt the necessity of fitting speaker mike in lecture hall. PPP is the most preferred medium by the students so every attempt should be done to increase effectiveness of PPP. Smart use of chalkboard will also increase impact of lecture OHP, as was least preferred by students, drastic changes should be made for increasing its effectiveness.


 Keywords: Chalkboard, Overhead Projector, Power Point Presentation

Full Text:

PDF

References


Santosh Kumar. 2000. Teaching-learning media the means to an end. 2nd ed. 2000. In: Ananthkrishnan N, Sethuraman K R, Santosh Kumar. Medical Education. Principles and Practice. Second Edition pp61-71.

Mehta, P.R. & Nataraj, G. 2002. Teaching learning Aids. In: P.S. Bhuiyan, N. N. & A. N. Supe. The Art of Teaching Medical Students. 2nd ed. pp133-144.

Seth, V., Upadhyay, P., Ahmad, M., Moghe V. 2010a. Power Point or chalk and talk: Perception of medical students versus dental students in a medical college in India. Advances in Medical Education and Practice,1 pp11-16.

Seval, K.S. & Aylin P. A. 2009. The effect of power point preferences of students on their performance: A Research In Anadolu University. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education. 10(1) pp 1302-6488.

James, K.E., Burke, L.A., Hutchins, H.M., 2006. Powerful or pointless? Faculty versus students' perceptions of Power Point in business education. Business Communication Quarterly. 69, pp374-396.

Amare, N. 2006. To slide ware or not to slide ware: Students experiences with power point vs lecture. Journal of Technical writing and Communication. 36(3), pp 297-308.

Savoy, A., Proctior, R.W., Salvendy, G. 2009, Information retention from Power Point and Traditinal lectures. Comput Educ. 52 pp 858-867.

Bartsch, R.A., Cobern, K.M., 2003, Effectiveness of Power Point presentation in lectures. Computers and Education. 41: pp77-86.

Novelli, E. L. B., Fernandes, A. A. H., 2007. Students preferred teaching techniques for biochemistry in biomedicine courses. Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 35:pp263-266.

Szabo, A. & Hasting, N. 2000. Using IT in the undergraduate classroom: should we replace the blackboard with Power Point? Computers & Education.35: pp175-187.

Dhaliwal, U. 2007. A Prospective Study of medical students ‘perspective of teaching– learning media: reiterating the importance of feedback. Journal of Indian Medical Association; 105 (11):pp 621-636.

Rocklin, T., 1997. PowerPoint is not evil. In: the National Teaching and Learning Forum. New York, NY: Greenwood Publishing Group; http://www. ntfl/sf/notevil.html.

Ruffini, M.F.2009. Creating Animation in PowerPoint to support Student learning and Engagement. EDUCASE Quarterly magazine. pp 32:34.

Kaharaman, S., Cevika, C., Kodana, H.2011. Investigation of university students’ attitude to award the use of power point according to some variable, Procedia computer science 3 pp 1341-1347.

Cigdem, U.Z., Orhan, F. &. Bilgic, G. 2010. Prospective teachers’ opinions on the value of PowerPoint presentations in lecturing. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2) pp 2051- 2059.

Casanova, J. & Casanova, S. L., 1991. Computers as electronic blackboard: Remodeling the organic chemistry lecture. Educom Rev.pp31-34.

Garg, A., Rataboli, P.V., Muchandi, K. 2004. Students opinion on the prevailing teaching methods in pharmacology and changes recommended. Indian Journal of Pharmacol. 36:pp 155-158.

Harden, R.M., 2008. Death by power point- the need for a ‘fidget index’. Medical teacher.30 pp 833-835.

Jones, A.M. 2003. Essay: The use and abuse of PowerPoint in Teaching and Learning in the Life Sciences: A Personal Overview. BEE-j Volume 2: November 2003 http://bio.ltsn.ac.uk/journal/vol2/beej-2-3pdf.

Seth, V., Upadhyay, P., Ahmad, M., Moghe V. 2010b. An Assessment of Teachers' Preference for Lecture Delivery Methods in Medical Education: Educational and Reviews, 5(9) pp 533-537 Sep 2010.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.