Effect of formative assessment of students on their academic performance in Department of Kriya Sharir

Pradnya D Dandekar

Abstract


Assessment is an integral part of the teaching learning process. It helps us to know the success of specific teaching & students’ progress. Formative assessment is the informal way of knowing students progress. To evaluate the effect of Formative Assessment of the students on their Academic performance this project was undertaken. The randomly selected group of 40 students was taught the topic Rasa & Rakta Dhatu at same time by using different types of teaching methods as didactic & demonstration. Then they randomly divided into two groups. Group A (N =20) was Control Group. No any intervention given to the students. Group B (N =20) was Experimental Group. This group was given the interventions by conducting quiz and group discussion on the topic of Rasa & Rakta Dhatu. Pretest and posttest based on MCQs to test recall memory & SAQs test to check analyzing power were developed on the topic of Rasa & Rakta Dhatu for both groups. The tests were then collected, scored and compiled. The students of Group B showed statistically significant improvement in recall memory which was tested by MCQs test (p=0.0001) & to test descriptive & analyzing power SAQs test was framed. Analysis showed enhancement in marks in SAQs but the result was not statistically significant. It was concluded that students assessed by formative assessment significantly score high than students who were not assessed. Formative assessment shows good effect on academic performance of the students & helps in enhancement of learning.

 

Keywords: Formative assessment, Quiz, Group discussion, MCQs, SAQs, Academic performance.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Hanna GS, Dettmer PA. Assessment for effective teaching: Using context-adaptive planning. Boston, MA: Pearson A&B. 2; 2004.

Mehmood T, Hussain T, Khalid M, Azam R. Impact of Formative Assessment on Academic Achievement of Secondary School Students, Int J Business Soc Sci. 2012;3(17).

http://myflorida.com/apps/vbs/vbs_www.ad.view_ad?advertisement_key_num=107800.

Sawyer RJ, Graham S, Harris KR. Direct teaching, strategy instruction, and strategy instruction with explicit self-regulation: Effects on the composition skills and self-efficacy of students with learning disabilities. J Educ Psychol. 1992;84(3):340.

Singh T, Gupta P, Singh D. Principles of Medical Education’ Jaypee Brothers Medical Publication, Third Edition 2009.

Ananthakrishnan N, Sethuraman, Kumar S. ‘Medical Education- Principles & Practice, Third Edition.

Northern Illinois University, Faculty Development and Instructional Design Center [email protected], http://facdev.niu.edu, 815.753.0595

Dunn K, Mulvenon SW. A critical review of research on formative assessment: the limited scientific evidence of the impact of formative assessment in education. Res Eval. 2009;14(7):10.

Bennett EB. Formative assessment: a critical review. Assess Educ: Princ, Policy Pract. 2011;18(1):5-25.

Amin Z, Hoon K. Basics in Medical Education, National University of Singapore; 2009.

Ruland JW. The Impact of using formative assessment attributes in daily instruction on student affect, dissertation submitted for doctoral degree; 2011.

Liebmann R. Sindberg M. The effects of incorporating formative assessment on testing, University of Wisconsin Oshkosh, WI 54901;2010.

Nicola DJ, Macfarlane D. Formative assessment and self regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Stud Higher Educ. 2006;31(2):199-218.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.