Assessment of professionalism and ethics

Adkoli B V

Abstract


Professionalism is the new buzz word in medical education and practice. The MCI Revised Graduate Medical Education Regulations 2017 emphasize the role of Indian Medical Graduate as a professional who is ethical, responsive, caring, compassionate, committed to excellence and accountable to patients, profession and community at large. A plan is underway to introduce Attitude Ethics and Communication (AETCOM) modules as a part and parcel of MBBS curriculum. However, how to translate this laudable plan in to action requires further deliberations.

The purpose of this article is to identify a comprehensive strategy for assessing professionalism. Teaching and assessment of professionalism are quite challenging. A combination of both objective and subjective tools is needed for giving credibility to the assessment. Continuous documentation and internal assessment coupled with portfolio approach can play a key role in assessment of these competencies.

 

Keywords: Professionalism, Ethics, Assessment.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Passi V, Doug M, Piele E, Thistlethwaite J, Johnson N. Developing a medical professionalism in future doctors: a systematic review. Int J Med Educ 2010;1:19-29.

Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) Common Program Requirements ACGME approved revisions to Sections I-V: effective 2007, 2013, 2015, 2016 ACGME approved major revision of Section VI: February, 2017; effective: July 1, 2017Available at http://www.acgme.org/Portals/0/PFAssets/ProgramRequirements/CPRs_2017-07-01.pdf

Kirk, L.M. (2007). Professionalism in medicine: definitions and considerations for teaching. Proc Bayl Univ Med Cent 2007;20:13-6.

Medical Council of India (MCI) Attitudes, Ethics and Communication (AETCOM) Modules 2016.

Dreyfus SE. The Five-Stage Model of Adult Skill Acquisition. 2004;24(3):177-81.

Krathwohl, D.R., Bloom, B.S., and Masia, B.B. Taxonomy of educational objectives: Handbook II: Affective domain. New York: David McKay Co. 1964.

Kirkpatrick, D. L. Evaluating training programs: the four levels. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler. 1994.

Modi JN, Anshu, Gupta P., Singh T. Teaching and assessing professionalism in the Indian context. Indian Pediatrics 2014;51:881-8.

Epstein, R.M., & Hundert, E.M. Defining and assessing professional competence. JAMA, 2002;287:226-35.

Ananthakrishnan N, Karthikeyan P, Jaganmohan R, Pulimoottil DT, Ravishaker M, Adkoli BV, et al. SBV Model of Competency Based Learning and Training (COBALT) For Post Graduate Education. Ann SBV 2017;6(1):5-9.

Cruess R, McLIroy JH, Cruess S, Ginsburg S, Steinert Y. The professionalism mini evaluation exercise: A preliminary investigation. Acad Med 2006;81:S74-8.

Kelley K.A., Stanke L.D., Rabi, S.M., Kuba, S.E., Janke K.K. (2011). Cross validation of an instrument for Measuring Professionalism Behaviours. Am J Pharm Educ 2011;75(9):1-10.

Robb, Y., Flemming, V, Dietert C. Measurement of clinical performance of nurses: A literature review. Nurse Education Today, 2002;22:293-300.

Norcini J., & Burch V. Workplace-based assessment as an educational tool: AMEE Guide No. 31. Med Teach 2007;29:855-71.

Cruess R.L., Cruess S.R., Steinert Y. Amending Miller’s Pyramid to include Professional Identity Formation. Acad Med 2016;91:180-85

Cate O.T., Hart D., Ankel F, Busari J., Englander R., Nicholas G. et al. Entrustment Decision Making in Clinical Training, Acad Med 2016;91:191–8.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.